• <-- Return to /current/
• --- Are pedophilia and child pornography wrong? ---
• Anonymous Speaker (2012-05-12 00:28 ID:EoMyNKuq )
• I think that pedophiles get far too much of a hard time. Like other paraphilias and sexual orientations, many pedophiles cannot help how they feel. The press has a tendency to use "pedophile" and "child molester" synonymously, when they aren't always one and the same. Pedophilia is a recognized mental disorder, but many pedophiles are missing out on proper support because of the stigma and paranoia surrounding pedophilia. Is being a pedophile wrong in itself?
• What about child pornography? From what I gather, most child pornography isn't Uncle Bill raping his niece, but rather "child modelling" photographs from where/when it is/was perfectly legal. The children and their parents consented. For material that has already been produced, should mere possession be illegal? Will it encourage further production and increased child molestation, or will it give pedophiles an outlet for their desires? What about lolicon, which is increasingly being covered by the same laws in many countries?
• Anonymous Speaker (2012-06-19 05:18 ID:jAufVJai )
• >>1 \n\n > >From what I gather, most child pornography isn't Uncle Bill raping his niece, but rather "child modelling" photographs from where/when it is/was perfectly legal. The children and their parents consented.That's not what I heard. Do you really think that in this day and age, when even cell phones have 5MP cameras, people who are aroused by children would be content with ancient grainy and often relatively blurry photos?
• Also, children cannot consent to this sort of thing. This is not a legal fiction. I'm all in favour of lowering the age of consent in some places, but the boundary line still has to be drawn somewhere after the onset of puberty. \n\n >>6 \n\n > >This is what happens when somebody starts believing that, against evidence, evolution is possible and that there is no God, your morals twist.You are a moron. Where's your evidence for the existence of God? Where's the evidence against the possibility, nay the fact, of evolution? Morality has nothing to do with believing in a big beard in the sky. \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2012-06-26 03:31 ID:mY1LaNFP )
• >>7 \n\n http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgGxIxSetJg&feature=g-vrec \n\n Here, disprove this. \n\n
• >>7 (2012-06-28 09:28 ID:jAufVJai )
• >>9
• <a href=http://4-ch.net/debate/kareha.pl/1244123052/13,14>Way ahead of you</a>. \n\n
• >>7 (2012-06-28 09:28 ID:jAufVJai )
• Bah, I keep forgetting to reset the post formatting. URL should be obvious enough though. \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2012-09-07 12:03 ID:b2DG0wLP )
• Being a pedophile? No.
• Molesting children? Yes.
• Getting your rocks off at CP? No. \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2014-10-08 04:17 ID:odIPlsin )
• Yes \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2019-02-08 14:35 ID:wPXiDWba )
• There's way too many people crying "pedophile" on the internet these days that it's starting to lose its meaning. While there are legitimate cases of actual child abuse, porn, and grooming being inflicted on real children through places like Twitter, Tumblr, and Discord, it becomes a joke when people use said cases to justify their argument on why loli and shota should be banned. \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2019-06-17 03:27 ID:lw6DklXe )
• >>1 \n\n Why Are Women's Nipples Still Regarded As 'Obscene'? http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/why-are-women-s-nipples-still-regarded-as-obscene-20190207-p50w75.html \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2019-09-16 14:51 ID:dB4XClka )
• > >MCMICHAEL claimed this post was a joke
• Anonymous Speaker (2020-08-06 16:13 ID:Cg1K9ML5 )
• >>17
• This p. much, "pedophile" is to the right wing what "Nazi" is to the left wing, i.e. a lazy mud-sling for "people I disagree with who are therefore evil incarnate regardless of the (in)applicability of the term's actual meaning". \n\n
• Anonymous Speaker (2020-12-27 09:28 ID:ZcqLtDOX )
• >>12 \n\n Pretty much this. \n\n
• Unverified Source (2025-04-29 16:10 ID:6+nXdus2 )
• Children get pleasure from their body the same as adults and a lot wish to explore it. I think that if it is two people in a loving experience and both parties want and consent then what right do we have to tell them they can not. Because you don't like it? does that then mean if it is disliked being gay is not allowed or trans and so on?. \n\n
• Unverified Source (2025-07-25 01:34 ID:o15ZKwiJ )
• If current events haven't convinced you that the witch hunts are just an excuse to go after "undesirables" while the elites do as they please, I don't know what will. \n\n
• Unverified Source (2025-07-25 09:34 ID:/lbLnGXS )
• >>19
• this \n\n
• Unverified Source (2025-08-27 12:04 ID:BbHxIoRO )
• You're a nonce aren't you \n\n
• Unverified Source (2026-01-07 18:11 ID:52R2pk8Y )
• Why even ask this,you idiot?Your brain is shrunken by mainstream social media,get off X and instagram and go outside,sheesh! \n\n
• Unverified Source (2026-01-14 18:26 ID:DnuCNR6a )
• >>24
• children aren't mentally mature enough to consent \n\n
• <-- Return to /current/