• <-- Return to /language/
• --- ITT We try to improve (ruin) the English language ---
• Anonymous Linguist (2026-01-26 05:42 ID:5NfxflJz )
• I'll start off with a completely original and much needed proposition; replacing C, Q, and X with K. \n\n These letters, besides from being an anagram of another thing we do not need, can easily be replaced by K. K and S for Cs respective hard and soft forms, K for Q, and a KS for X.
• I do not know how C has not been split already, surely my ancestors weren't this stupid! K and S are so much more easier to decipher, you have to memorize the word when it comes to C. Please! Just give me a S and be done with it, I don't want to have a letter that could easily stand for another sound.
• Meanwhile, Q is just embarrassing to have around, least used letter of all, why even bother with it? Tradition? Etymological marking? Oh please.
• And finally for X, what's the point of having a letter for two other letters? Just nonsensical, just orthographic bloat. \n\n
• <-- Return to /language/